Reporter speaks out about Morgan Freeman’s lewd purple carpet comment


Editor’s uncover: Maggie Parker is an entertainment journalist and a frequent contributor to PEOPLE. Within the wake of sexual harassment allegations against Morgan Freeman reported by CNN, she decided to fragment her memoir of a purple carpet encounter with the actor. In a assertion on Might also 24, Freeman, eighty, replied to the CNN articulate: “Anybody who knows me or has labored with me knows I am no longer any individual who would intentionally offend or knowingly rating someone feel uneasy. I apologize to someone who felt miserable or disrespected — that used to be never my intent.”

Who would dare to stride up against God? Sixteen folks, actually. And I’m going to be No. 17.

CNN released a memoir Thursday by which reporters, production workers, and others came forward to accuse Morgan Freeman of sexual harassment and sinister habits. Eight of them had been alleged victims of harassment or sinister habits by Freeman. The many eight talked about they witnessed Freeman’s alleged habits.

I plunge into the first neighborhood.

I was a 25-twelve months-pale, green and sure on-camera reporter for a men’s journal once I first met Freeman at the premiere of Now You Scrutinize Me in 2013. My videographer and I sure to quiz every actor, from Freeman to Stamp Ruffalo to Isla Fisher to Michael Caine, “Within the occasion you would possibly well presumably presumably live one magic trick, what would it be?” The answers ranged from disappearing to saving the ambiance, but Freeman’s used to be the accurate outlier.

After I requested the quiz, he replied, “You desire me to explain something neat don’t you?” I didn’t of route rating what he intended, so I talked about, “You don’t absorb to.” As in, be your self, no longer realizing what I was getting myself into. He looked me up and down and talked about, “Honey, you wouldn’t absorb a sew on…how about that?” I laughed. But I’ll be beautiful with you, I was no longer most productive caught off-guard, I was additionally perplexed. Did this apparently candy pale actor mean what I thought he intended?

Consistent with the Macmillan Dictionary, “no longer absorb a sew on” device “to no longer be carrying any attire.”

RELATED: Morgan Freeman hits on reporter in resurfaced video: ‘I rating to absorb a study at you and drool’

Within the second, it took me a second to job and enhance. This at the time 75-twelve months-pale Oscar winner factual in most cases told me, a third of his age, he wanted to glance me bare…thanks, I assume? Strategies you, he knew there used to be a camera on him, and he used to be surrounded by various actors and reporters. Nonetheless, he talked about it.

He walked away, and I became to my videographer; we had been each disquieted. I wasn’t upset, or, I didn’t know I must be upset. It used to be extra of discomfort and quite of violation.

But that rapid dissipated, on memoir of we purchased something factual. On camera. The clip used to be amusing and juicy. Indubitably, this can blow up. I went dwelling, furious to glance the video live, but additionally feeling esteem something used to be off and I couldn’t rather put my finger on it. I blamed it on the fact that I didn’t react faster—“need to work on caught-off-guard reaction for the long term,” I infamous to myself. Essentially the most easy blame I positioned that evening used to be on myself. How does that rating any sense?

The video went live the following day. But it didn’t blow up.

Nearly precisely five years later, I’ll never neglect my mint green dress that felt esteem it used to be being taken off with Freeman’s eyes. On the the same time, I’ll additionally never neglect feeling a bit flattered—a truly, very infamous actor told me I’m beautiful. Not in those words. But, he did. That’s rating of cool…beautiful?


As I purchased older, I slowly began to realize how contaminated his comment used to be, and embarrassment impart in.

I was embarrassed for no longer being extra tormented by it, for no longer taking circulate after. I didn’t acknowledge the discomfort I felt. I was so frail to it; I’d been eyed and catcalled all my life—I was a lady with noticeable body ingredients. Plus, it would maybe well presumably had been device worse.

It never of route hit me that it used to be harassment. There are so mighty of inadvertent boundaries positioned on folks thru sexual misconduct. Victims usually abilities guilt for feeling careworn when any individual accessible has had it mighty worse than them, or affirm that they’re overreacting about factual some silly comment. That is the last component a victim must feel.

Then the Harvey Weinstein news broke, and I in the shatter realized there used to be a favorable motive something felt off that evening. I must never had been uncovered to such degrading comments, especially in the residing of commercial, no matter how minor and fleeting the second used to be. I was extra than a body, but in that second, Freeman made me feel otherwise.

Unfortunately, all those years laughing it off absorb tag me. I didn’t feel I had a gorgeous to be inflamed if I wasn’t then. The worst portion used to be, I wasn’t the very best one who felt this device.

After I told folks I was penning this text, some wondered the validity of it. On memoir of it “didn’t problem me at the time.” On memoir of I made jokes about it and shared it evenly when folks requested about attention-grabbing purple carpet bustle-ins. It sounds as if, I wore it esteem a badge of honor.

Initially: No one knows how that affected me but me. Second of all: That’s the express subject. That I didn’t routinely rating offended. Finding out the accounts of Weinstein’s accusers helped me realize why I brushed it off—the the same motive many females did with Weinstein, and Matt Lauer, and Louis C.K., and so forth: that factual wasn’t how it labored. Successfully-known men had been untouchable. They of route would maybe well presumably live no contaminated. This used to be OK. If anything else, it used to be factual to rating the eye of a infamous man…no matter rating of attention that used to be.


I felt it used to be time to attain forward, but there had been quiet some concerns.

This used to be Morgan Freeman. The loved man who’s performed God and raised money for various charities along side the Red Irascible. The particular person for whom every person stood when he purchased the SAG Lifestyles Achievement Award, and who rating of spoke about gender equality in his acceptance speech.

Admire plenty of the females who’ve spoken out against men in highly efficient positions, I knew this would maybe presumably affect my occupation. I interview celebrities for a living, and I know they’re human, they rating errors, so I gave him a second probability. But 18 potentialities is no longer something I’m moving to give, especially if meaning one extra woman, or young reporter, is at probability of be negatively tormented by his habits. And it’s no longer even of route about Freeman. It’s about making particular folks know this device of habits is detrimental and unacceptable.

Which brings me attend to my customary quiz, live I mess with the man who has performed God extra than one cases?

Attributable to the courage I’ve received from the females who came sooner than me, I absorb decided I could. This is no longer a laughing matter, and it never must had been in the first residing.

God, you messed with the contaminated girls.

Comments are closed.